I got up far too early this morning but couldn’t get my brain to spin up to a speed sufficient to write.
So, after scrolling through the twitterverse and facebookland, I read.
In no particular order, these are the news stories that stayed with me from this morning’s reading.
Let us gather at the Texas cesspool
.. perhaps it’s we the people who lack ethical backbone. Despite the fact the attorney general above all should stand free of even a hint of corruption, Ken Paxton won re-election last fall. Given the lack of accountability prevalent in American politics, it’s little wonder then his wife filed this legislative indiscretion for all to ponder. — Waco Tribune editorial
This story broke last week. The story (and editorial) concerns a bill filed in the Texas Senate that would make registering as an investments counselor essentially unnecessary. Under present law, failure to register is a felony — exactly what Ken Paxton, our sitting Attorney General, has been indicted for. What’s, uhm, interesting, is that the bill was filed by a freshman senator, one Angela Paxton, Ken’s wife.
Does anyone remember Ma & Pa Ferguson? Well, my Taylor friends should because Dan Moody, then Texas Attorney General, led the investigation that saw Ferguson impeached for “misapplication of funds,” among other charges. Later, in 1926, Moody defeated Ma Ferguson for governor. I just thought this and the Paxton stories resonated.
Read original Texas Tribune story here and the Waco Tribune’s editorial here.
State leaders proposed a low-balled rollback property tax rate. It doesn’t look like that low rate will stick.
“We do our worst work when we work under deadlines — especially artificial deadlines.” — Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer (D-San Antonio)
A few weeks ago, the Governor, Lt. Governor and Speaker of the House announced they would push for a 2.5% rollback rate on property taxes. That number is beginning to look a little squishy, which is good news for local governments but maybe not-so-good for cash-strapped property tax payers.
The fact is, we’ve been in a quandary about how to fund state and local services for decades. Right now, cities, schools and counties depend mostly upon property taxes. The state depends upon sales taxes, along with taxes on oil and gas production.
During one of the many school finance reform battles from earlier this century, I asked a Republican state senator what the answer was. He replied “We need a way to spread the tax burden out over the largest number of people possible. Not only would that be more fair, it would probably raise a bit more money.”
“You mean, like a state income tax?” I asked.
Startled, he looked at me and said, “Yes, but you can’t quote me on that.”
Anyway, the Texas Tribune story on the most recent developments in the state’s effort to curb property taxes while also adequately funding public school is here.
State lawyers say county election officials are the ones breaking the law
The slow moving train wreck that is the botched rollout of a list of 95,000 Texas suspected of voting illegally took a strange turn in a San Antonio federal court yesterday.
From the linked Texas Tribune story: That list was accompanied by press releases by the secretary of state’s and attorney general’s offices that said the voters had been “identified by [the Department of Public Safety] as non-citizens.” Attorney General Ken Paxton (remember him?) touted the release on Twitter with the preface “VOTER FRAUD ALERT.” President Donald Trump also tweeted about it, falsely claiming that “58,000 non-citizens voted” in Texas.
Despite this, a lawyer for the state insisted that the list, and accompanying advice, was in no way license for county elections administrators to purge any voter roll. Some election administrators insisted that it was.
That hearing continues today but you can catch up on all the drama here. And here. And here. And watch for a forthcoming Ragged Edge, “Why does Texas make it so danged hard to vote?”
Can you say “bi-partisanship? Sure, I knew you could!”
“You can be 100 percent right on any issue, but unless you can convince 217 of your colleagues, it ain’t going to happen. Majority rules, with plenty of protection for the minority, but majority has to rule … How do you get somebody to agree with you? It helps to be right, be persistent and don’t mislead them.” — former West Texas Congressman Charlie Stenholm
My friend Harold Cook (@hcookaustin) posted this story this morning and it gives me a bit of hope, or nostalgia, and harkens back to the good old days when politicians could reach across the aisle. Now they do that only to give each other a good whack, if they do it at all. It’s a quick read from the Amarillo Reporter.